KONKELnews - Cachelan WebFilm
health care.jpg

Patient Wait Times Guarantees

The Wait Times Alliance (WTA) has issued its Spring Report Card on health care wait times and states “that slow and steady progress is being made in reducing delays in treatment.�

The WTA has described the Conservative announcement of Patient Wait Times Guarantees in every province as an “important step in the right direction.�

The WTA Spring Report Card awarded a ‘B’ grade for sight restoration, rising from a ‘C’ last November.

The WTA spring report card elevated Joint Replacements to a ‘B’ rating, up from a ‘C’ last year. 

 

Eighty-five per cent of Canadians surveyed want Wait Times Guarantees, and they want governments to work together to deliver them.

 

After 13 years of Liberal inaction, Canadians had zero wait time guarantees.  Wait times were allowed to double from nine weeks to 17.5 weeks as Liberals slashed healthcare funding.

 

This year, slightly over a year after taking office, the action-oriented decisions of the federal Conservative government has introduced 13 Patient Wait Times Guarantees.

 

Budget 2007 tackled wait times with over $1 billion in funding:

 

$612 million for the Patient Wait Times Guarantee Trust;

 

$30 million for wait times pilot projects; and

 

$400 million for Canada Health Infoway, the independent, non-profit corporation which is helping advance the use of health information technology across the country. 

 

In areas selected by the provinces, patients will be automatically offered alternate options if their wait time is too long. This will help reduce their stress on Canadians in need of health services.

 

When a government makes an investment in the health of people, it’s making an investment in the country’s future.  The Patient Wait Times Guarantees negotiated with the provinces and territories mark yet another step forward in our government’s commitment to building a stronger, safer, better Canada for all of us. 

global warming turbi...

Green Report: Welcome to Planet Al

 

On the road with the larger-than-life, jet-setting, celebrity-magnet, environmental, rock star, Al Gore

 

It's 10 a.m. on April 23, the Monday after Earth Day, when a Falcon 20 twin-engine turbo jet descends from the gauzy sky above Regina's airport. Direct from Nashville, Al Gore, the former U.S. vice-president turned superstar salesman-in-chief for the "climate crisis," emerges with a single assistant. A security detail and two high-end hybrids -- a Prius and a Lexus GS 450h -- meet him on the tarmac. Gore was meant to fly commercial, but that didn't jibe with his schedule. A local radio station calculates his jaunt through Western Canada will use enough fuel to refill an average car 137 times.

 

Today's destination is the Brandt Centre, a hockey arena the colour of an unripe tomato, which over the weekend hosted Monster Spectacular, a gas-guzzling extravaganza billed as the "biggest monster truck event ever presented in Regina." It featured cars so gargantuan they're worthy of names: Bounty Hunter, Godzilla, Maniac, Iron Outlaw, Jurassic Attack. The joke around Regina was that the fumes wouldn't clear in time for Gore's speech.

 

His visit, at the invitation of Saskatchewan Premier Lorne Calvert, has not been without controversy. Back in his White House days, Bill Clinton used to joke that he could raise money by charging donors US$10,000 for a "private meeting with Al Gore to discuss reinventing government." The punchline was: "And for US$20,000, you don't have to go." Now Gore's speaking fee is $125,000 -- and no one is laughing. SaskTel, the province's telephone company and a Crown corporation, is covering the event's estimated $208,000 cost.

 

When the event fails to sell out, other Crown corporations, including SaskPower and SaskEnergy, step in to purchase seats by the hundreds, triggering opposition complaints in the legislature. Calvert, meanwhile, stands accused of jumping on the global-warming cavalcade by inviting Gore -- a charge local media, angry that a Gore dictate has barred cameras and microphones from his speech, are only too happy to report. That a provincial premier could use Gore to try to score political points is a measure of the former VP's stunning transformation from long-winded butt of jokes to global celebrity, a sort of Bono without the music, who counts among his friends celebrities and entertainment moguls like Robert De Niro, Madonna, and director Rob Reiner, who is bringing back his fake band Spinal Tap to help Gore save the planet. Gore calls himself a "recovering politician" and touts his mission as non-partisan and non-ideological. But as the Harper government will discover by the end of a week, it's not all Kumbaya. The guy who won more popular votes than the sitting President is still capable of a powerful political slap-down.

 

Yet Gore is still more than a politician-turned-preacher: he is a businessman, big-time. No one knows how much he's worth, but the speculation is that it's enough to launch another run for the White House (an option Gore declines to rule out). Three years before its multi-billion-dollar IPO, Web search-engine Google brought Gore on as a "special adviser." What precisely he does for Google and how much his stock options are worth is a closely guarded secret. ("Gore is an adviser to the company and has counselled Google on a range of issues pertaining to our business and his experience in international markets," a Google spokesman emailed Maclean's, adding, "We cannot provide any further comment, nor put someone on the phone to discuss.") Gore also sits on the board of Apple Computer, and has founded Current TV, a cable and satellite TV network based on viewer-created content, for which he is to receive an International Emmy later this year. And he has co-founded a global investment firm with David Blood, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

 

But to the 3,800 believers in jeans and baseball caps who have paid $20 to $70 for a chance to hear him in Regina, Gore is guru. When he is introduced by Calvert, the crowd ecstatically leaps to its feet. "I am Al Gore," he begins. "I used to be the next president of the United States." He used to fly Air Force Two, he says. "Now I have to take my shoes off to get on an airplane." Thus the stage version of An Inconvenient Truth begins -- and quickly disappoints. Funny on screen, but in Regina it is shtick: strange, a little mechanical, something like reading a movie novelization. From a graphic of the atmosphere's mounting CO2 levels to before and after pictures of vanishing glaciers, the audience has seen it before. A photograph of polar bears trapped on a wilting iceberg. Ships beached on a desert bed where once water flowed. Beyond a few jabs at Canadian issues -- the ravaging pine beetle, drying prairie potholes, the stressed Athabasca River -- the talk is little changed from the film. And so the crowd starts to fidget -- until Gore mangles the name of the province, giving each syllable equal weight and even missing a consonant or two. "Sa-Ka-Cha-One." There are muffled giggles. He says the word again, now louder, prompting another titter.

 

It is shaping up to be a challenging day for Gore. His next stop is Calgary, capital of Canada's oil patch, and home to executives who manage over $100 billion in oil developments, backed by a government that stands ardently opposed to the Kyoto accord. Protesters greet Gore when he arrives later that afternoon. One man, dressed in a yellow chicken costume, carries a sign: "Al Gore and Chicken Little -- partners in false panic." Another yells into a megaphone: "Al Gore is lying to you," addressing the gathering crowd in their cocktail dresses and suits. "Each and every one of you has paid money to be lied to."

 

In Calgary's Jack Singer Concert Hall, with its 90-tonne spruce-wood acoustical canopy suspended above the stage, Gore faces a sold-out crowd of 1,800, made up in large part of energy industry luminaries who've shelled out $150 a ticket and who risk, just by their very presence, Kyoto-induced spontaneous combustion

 

There is Ed Stelmach, the Alberta premier, Environment Minister Rob Renner, Calgary Mayor Dave Bronconnier, energy bigwigs like Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. vice-chairman Murray Edwards. It appears as if every CEO in town has shown up. Before taking to the stage, Gore meets with them at a closed-door session set up by the Calgary Chamber of Commerce and the University of Calgary, the event's co-sponsors.

 

Just last summer, Gore had badmouthed these very people to Rolling Stone magazine. "Take the tar sands of Western Canada," he'd said then. "For every barrel of oil they extract there, they have to use enough natural gas to heat a family's home for four days. And they have to tear up four tons of landscape, all for one barrel of oil. It is truly nuts. But you know, junkies find veins in their toes. It seems reasonable, to them, because they've lost sight of the rest of their lives." The remarks made Stelmach balk. "Where do you think we're selling the oil?" he told the Calgary Herald hours before Gore's arrival. "Right to his own country."

 

So why did the Albertans shell out to see him? "I didn't want to have to answer the question, why didn't I come," says Renner, who adds that he and Gore don't differ on the facts. "The point at which we probably begin to lose convergence is when he suggests Kyoto as a solution." And why are the energy CEOs here? They're not talking, but the head of Calgary's Glenbow Museum and a member of the board of directors of the David Suzuki Foundation, Mike Robinson, speculates, "They want to know if his arguments are sharp enough to take them on."

 

The sharpness of his arguments may in the end matter less than how loud they are. And Gore has become an expert at turning up the volume. The profits from his Oscar-winning documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, and the book it inspired, go to paying for the training of 1,000 volunteers, from housewives to actress Cameron Diaz, who will fan out and present his slide show to more audiences than Gore can personally reach. Gore is also overseeing Live Earth, a series of massive rock concerts to be held on seven continents on July 7, featuring 150 artists such as Madonna, Bon Jovi, Kanye West, Ludacris, the Black Eyed Peas and Spinal Tap, to name a few. Live Earth producer Kevin Wall, who did Live Aid, aims to reach two billion people.

 

But the ticket sales from this extravaganza won't go toward planting trees or scrubbing smokestacks. They'll go to an outfit chaired by Gore called the Alliance for Climate Protection, a sort of sophisticated PR company for the idea of a climate crisis. The group exists to "generate overwhelming public support" and to create a "tipping point" in public opinion for the idea that there is a crisis, and to tell people how to fix it. It's a circle creating buzz to raise money to create more buzz. Oil patch beware.

 

But at 7 p.m. in Calgary, the oil patch is applauding. Gore took Regina's standing ovation in stride, but he seems genuinely stunned when the Calgary crowd jumps to its feet to greet him. "I'm really grateful," he tells the audience, adding that he's never had a similar invitation from Houston. He acknowledges that there are many here who "feel like they disagree with me." But, he adds, "Reasonable people can disagree. If you have a disagreement on something -- all right, talk it out." Then he is off. "I am Al Gore," he begins. "I used to be the next president of the United States."

If Gore had bored his Regina converts, he now holds Calgary rapt. Most people in the audience, including Stelmach, have never seen An Inconvenient Truth. And Gore modifies his shtick. Where he had worked anti-Bush material for laughs in Regina, in Calgary he promises to tone down the "cheap shots." Where he told Regina that global-warming skeptics are "a group more rapidly shrinking in numbers than the glaciers," in Calgary he is more circumspect. "I don't mean to push this down your throats," he says.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it," he tells his listeners, quoting Upton Sinclair. The audience responds with nervous recognition, embarrassed laughter. He is, he tells them again, "genuinely humbled" to be speaking to people who might rather not hear his message. Then his voice lapses into whisper, a preacher's trick, as a list of Kyoto member countries dances on the immense screen behind him. Canada, he says, is a country of moral authority, a country that has contributed more blue-helmeted peacekeepers than any other. "That country would turn its back on this treaty? I don't think so."

 

Now the applause comes only piecemeal, from corners of the hall. A line of oil-and-gassers who had gathered into a joshing row just as the lights dimmed now grows silent. Arms are crossed. Heads shake.

 

At the close of Gore's address -- it is three hours, though his sponsors paid for the short version -- the front of the crowd gathers again to its feet, and row after row joins them. The oil-and-gassers turn on their heels and leave.

 

Then Gore receives an honorary doctorate from the University of Calgary. "I

really felt a surge of emotion. This really means a lot to me," he says.

 

Later, Gore presses the flesh at a wine-and-cheese reception for the energy people. His face red with exertion, he smiles wanly, grasping hands. Photographs are taken (one man says he wants a shot with Gore to showcase in his office alongside his picture with Margaret Thatcher). Says Gore's "great, great friend," the environmentalist David Suzuki: "I think there were a lot of skeptics here. But they came." Scott Thon, president and CEO of AltaLink, responsible for nearly 60 per cent of Alberta's transmission lines, says, "I don't know if people were swayed." But Heather Douglas, head of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, is giddy. The evening "felt like a seismic shift in Calgary," she says. "The vice-president was genuinely touched to be in one of the capitals of the energy world -- and to be received so generously and so graciously." Outside the hall, one of the oil-and-gas types dismisses Gore's appearance as a "great show" designed for "the same people who like Michael Moore."

 

Like Moore, Gore is a lightning rod. Earlier this year an anti-regulation group in Tennessee got hold of utility bills showing that Gore's Nashville mansion consumed 20 times the energy of an average American household. Gore defended himself by saying that he and his wife work from home, that some of that power is produced by renewable sources, and that he offsets his energy use by buying carbon credits. (He also had tried to install solar panels on his house, a move that was blocked until recently by local regulations.)

 

But the whiff of hypocrisy lingered. When Gore testified to the Senate environment committee, a Republican senator asked him to pledge to downsize his lifestyle; Gore refused. As for the offsets, some environmentalists criticize the scheme for exculpating people from actually cutting their emissions. Other critics then accused Gore of enriching himself by buying the carbon offsets from a company he owns. It turns out they had it wrong. The investment company he co-founded, Generation Investment Management LLP, doesn't sell the carbon offsets to Gore; rather it buys them for Gore -- a perk it provides for all of its employees. The credits are bought from the British-based CarbonNeutral Co., which then pays for a "micro-hydro" project in Bulgaria and a solar project in Sri Lanka. Gore's firm also buys carbon credits through the Chicago Climate Exchange, according to company spokesman Richard Campbell, who declined to disclose how much the company spends on offsetting Gore's carbon emissions, explaining that his critics are on the lookout for numbers "to exploit."

 

There is no denying that, while the climate crisis is Gore's mission, it is also his business. His investment company is not, as it's frequently touted, an environmentally focused one. It's actually a mainstream investment bank, looking for firms that will profit from long-term trends -- such as public concern over the climate crisis. Generation Investment has bought into General Electric, for example, because GE makes energy-efficient light bulbs and plans to focus on energy-efficient appliances. It's a seamless project for Gore. The more people Gore can persuade to buy energy-efficient light bulbs, the better for the planet -- and the better for GE, the better for Generation Investment Management, and the better for Gore.

 

After Calgary, he hits Indianapolis, for a Tuesday meeting of mayors, where Gore presents his slide show at a synagogue, and later boasts that while climate change was not on the mayors' agenda, it quickly became "the only thing they talked about."

 

By Wednesday morning, he's standing on a theatre stage in lower Manhattan for a news conference about the Tribeca Film Festival -- an event whose opening he will preside over later in the evening. He has swapped his suit and tie for an all-black ensemble that on a fitter man might suggest Han Solo. It's the same getup his "very close friend," Hollywood über-director Rob Reiner (Stand By Me, When Henry Met Sally, A Few Good Men), is wearing as they appear alongside the billionaire mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg. "Al, don't you just hate those rumours about running for the White House?" ribs Bloomberg, who is himself a frequent object of such speculation. Bloomberg, who ran as a Republican in a mostly liberal city, has just announced a plan to reduce New York's emissions in part by slapping a congestion tax of US$8 on cars and up to US$21 for trucks to enter parts of Manhattan. Commuters are incensed, and he could use a public pat on the back from Gore, whom he introduces to the assembled New York press as "the hottest leading man of the moment, Oscar-winner, and matinee idol." Gore obliges, twice calling Bloomberg's initiatives "gutsy."

Gore is touting nine short films with a climate crisis message that will premier at the festival. They were commissioned by SOS Films, another project of Wall's, the producer of Live Earth. One Less Car portrays cyclists in New York. Sunny Day encourages the people of Los Angeles to ditch the clothes dryer and hang their wash outside instead. One documentary asks children such uplifting questions as, "Why are the polar ice caps melting?" and "How long do you think the world will last?"

Among the glitterati there is no eye-rolling, just mutual adulation, not to mention the kind of self-importance only the entertainment industry can muster. Wall, who takes to the stage in jeans, calls Live Earth "one of the most important events ever produced." Movie producer Jane Rosenthal (Meet the Fockers, Wag the Dog, The Good Shepherd), who co-founded the festival with filmmaker Robert De Niro, says the goal is to "imprint environmental awareness on the collective consciousness of the entire plant."

Gore, who insists the planetary "tipping point" on climate change is near, chooses this moment to mention his meeting with oil executives in Calgary. Whatever went on behind closed doors in Calgary clearly made an impression, because he no longer compares them to heroin junkies. "We had a very frank and full discussion about the choices we have to make as a society about producing energy without so much carbon pollution in the atmosphere," he says. Pressed by Maclean's to elaborate, Gore says the industry executives told him, " 'If this thing is what you say it is, we want to figure out what we can do to be a part of the solution.' " He gushes: "I love that. I love it. We're going to need them to play that role." He acknowledges the initial successes of carbon capture and sequestration projects in Alberta -- before ending on a bittersweet note. "I don't want to hold out a vain hope that that's going to make it possible to develop the tar sands," he says. "I actually think that it's more likely than not that the emissions related to that energy source will overwhelm the efforts to capture the carbon. But the spirit of open discussion that I encountered there was great. And that's what we need. We've got to get back to a point where we don't make facts a battleground."

Around 7 p.m., the stars begin arriving at the Tribeca Performing Arts Center -- some in official festival SUVs that event sponsor General Motors has prominently marked "HYBRID," others in old-school stretch limos and Hummers. The climate is not co-operating, and the organic and biodegradable red carpet is drenched with rain. De Niro is here, as is Canadian-born screenwriter and director Paul Haggis, Jon Bon Jovi, The Sopranos' Edie Falco, and models Christie Brinkley and Shalom Harlow, all moving in a hail of flashbulbs. "I'm hoping to meet Al Gore," starlet Kerry Washington tells the paparazzi on her way in to the gala. "I think he's fantastic. Thank God for you!" Metal barricades corral the autograph seekers, including 13-year-old New Yorker Anne Kaplan, who is too young to remember Gore's years in the White House but old enough to have seen his movie three times. Gore is "very cool," she explains, because "he won an Oscar and he knows what he's talking about."

The festival will roll on for two weeks, premiering films like Spider-Man 3 and documentaries by Angelina Jolie and Ricki Lake. But by Saturday morning, Gore is already back in Canada, to speak to a mostly middle-class audience of 1,100 at an environmental consumer show in Toronto, and to make his biggest headlines of the week. A pair of last-minute tickets for this appearance are available on eBay for $1,000. Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty sits in the front row. Another standing ovation. Photographers get 10 minutes to snap Gore's picture before the media is ordered out. It's during this photo op that he unleashes on the Canadian government's recently released plan to combat global warming. "In my opinion, it is a complete and total fraud," he says. "It is designed to mislead the Canadian people." After spanking the Tories, Gore lunches with McGuinty and 25 others. Then it's off to the upscale Royal York Hotel for a half-hour meeting with McGuinty and Ontario Environment Minister Laurel Broten.

At 5 p.m., he speaks to a Bay Street crowd of 3,200 at an invite-only event sponsored by the VenGrowth and Criterion Investment firms. It takes place at the Hummingbird Centre, where the steady stream of non-hybrid Lexuses, Jaguars, Mercedes and BMWs begins arriving about an hour early. Then he's off to a cocktail reception at the Hockey Hall of Fame, with 600 guests, where Gore is presented with a Toronto Maple Leafs jersey emblazoned "Gore 07."

Before night falls, the Canadian government is firing back. "It is difficult to accept criticism from someone who preaches about climate change, but who never submitted the Kyoto Protocol to a vote in the United States Senate, who never did as much as Canada is now doing to fight climate change during eight years in office," Environment Minister John Baird says in a statement. Baird says Gore is in no position to comment, having not been briefed on the Conservative plan. But a Gore representative says the former vice-president had the chance to both "read" and "review" the necessary documentation.

Whatever the case, Gore has made his mark. Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion and the NDP's Jack Layton are quick to associate themselves with the public face of enviro-friendliness. "Mr. Baird is embarrassing Canada around the world," Dion says. By the afternoon of Monday, April 30, the controversy is strong enough to interrupt another day of bitter debate over military detainees in Afghanistan. First Bloc Québécois MP Bernard Bigras, and then several Liberals, rise during Question Period to throw Gore's f-word back at the government. Eventually, Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn takes the bait. "Mr. Speaker," he says, "the only inconvenient truth is the absolute, deplorable record of the Liberal Party of Canada on the environment."

Meanwhile, Gore reflects on his trip to the Canadian oil patch in his online journal at AlGore.com, and concludes that "the conversation has been taken to a higher, more productive level."

Macleans May 2007

afghanistan.jpg

Opposition Motion on Afghanistan

 

On Thursday 19 April 2007, the Liberals opted to use their Opposition Day to recklessly and prematurely call for the withdrawal of Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan.

 

This is a reckless and premature motion from the Official Opposition.  The passage of this motion would encourage our foes and lead to more intensive offensive action against our soldiers, unarmed development workers, diplomats and unarmed police functioning in a training capacity, who are working selflessly in Afghanistan to rebuild that country and provide stability for the Afghan people.

 

To prematurely decide to leave Afghanistan would be detrimental to the mission and all of the positive results thus far in rebuilding the country.

 

The Government of Mr Harper brought forward a motion to the House of Commons to extend the current Afghan mission to February 2009. Canada’s New Government has been clear that if we were to seek further extension it would come to Parliament to do that, and that remains our position.

 

Canada, along with 36 other nations, is in Afghanistan at the request of the democratically elected government of that nation as part of a UN-sanctioned mission to help build a stable, democratic and self-sufficient society.

 

Canada has shown leadership by committing development assistance and deploying diplomats, development workers, troops and civilian police to help the democratically elected Afghan government secure a better future for its people. We have made a commitment to the Afghan people, and we will stand by that commitment.

 

Helping Afghanistan continues the noble Canadian tradition of taking an active role in bringing stability and peace to parts of the world that have seen turmoil and upheaval.

 

Moreover, Canada’s efforts in Afghanistan are guided by the Afghanistan Compact, which provides a framework for coordinating the work of the Afghan government and its international partners by outlining specific outcomes, as well as the benchmarks and timelines for their delivery in the three areas of security, governance and development.

 

We are making progress ��' unthinkable only a few years ago ��' which is a testament to the will and fortitude of the Afghan people, as well as to the commitment and engagement of the international community. A new Afghan constitution has restored the rule of law and respect for the human rights of every Afghan citizen, including those of women and children, women now have the right to vote and girls can now go to school.

 

Our troops and all Canadians in Afghanistan deserve our support as they work to bring security and democracy to that country.

 

Terrorism remains a very real threat to global peace and security.  Afghanistan has been used as a base for terrorists in the past.  In the interests of our collective security, Canada and our international partners share a responsibility to help ensure that terrorism cannot again take root in Afghanistan. 

 

We owe it to the noblest traditions of this nation and its commitment to the principles of democracy to stay the course.    

gun control.jpg

Effective Gun Control

Following the tragic events at Virginia Tech, there has been increased media attention on gun control in Canada

The condolences of all Canadians go out to the families and friends of the victims.

Tragically, in the context of this horrific event that has shocked the world, the Opposition parties seek to capitalize on this massive human tragedy in the House of Commons by turning it into a partisan political issue. 

For the record, Opposition parties continue to spread misinformation about the long-gun registry because they are trying to hide the fact that it is a $1 billion boondoggle.

Yesterday people would have to register if they wanted to acquire a firearm.  Today they would have to register.  Tomorrow and into the future anybody wanting to acquire any type of firearm has to have a license.  That is not changing. 

Unlike the Stephane Dion Liberals, Canada’s New Government is committed to effective gun control and tackling the criminal misuse of firearms. We believe in targeting criminals • not duck hunters and farmers.

That’s why we allocated $14 million over 2 years in Budget 2007 to improve front-end screening of first-time firearms licence applicants. This will help prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands.

 The Liberals continuously neglected our licensing system and instead wasted $1 billion on the failed long gun registry, which was publicly decried by the Auditor General.

“ In her annual report to Parliament for the year 2002, Auditor General Sheila Fraser ticked off the usual horror stories of waste and mismanagement, including multinational companies that operate in Canada enjoying hundreds of millions of dollars in tax loopholes and Public Works Canada spending $1.7 billion annually on office space without fully assessing need.

But by far the most eye-catching item was Fraser's account of how the federal Department of Justice handled the controversial Canadian Firearms Program, which took effect in December 1998. Initial estimates priced the program at $119 million over five years, with licence and registration fees from firearms owners expected to return $117 million - a net cost of just $2 million. But by 2000, reports Fraser, the Justice Department pegged the cost at upwards of $1 billion, with return fees of $140 million - meaning taxpayers are on the hook for at least $860 million.

Worse yet, says Fraser, the Justice Department advised the government about the revised estimates, but no one saw fit to keep the House of Commons informed. "The issue here is not gun control," declared Fraser. "And it's not even astronomical cost overruns, although those are serious. What's really inexcusable is that Parliament was in the dark."

Macleans Magazine 16 December 2002

Canada’s New Government is also invested $161 million over two years to add 1,000 more RCMP personnel to focus on law-enforcement priorities, such as gun smuggling.

 Since taking office, Canada’s New Government has brought forward 11 new legislative proposals that will help crack down on crime, such as:

    • Restricting conditional sentences, such as house arrest, for serious crimes;
    • Imposing mandatory prison sentences for gun crimes; and
    • Keeping in prison the most violent, most dangerous repeat offenders in the country.

 

  • The opposition parties are being soft on crime and are blocking these tough on crime bills from moving forward. Canadians expect action • not further Liberal delays.  

Canada’s New Government is committed to ensuring that firearm owners comply with the laws of Canada.

Effective gun control means encouraging the compliance of firearms owners and also by encouraging former license holders to come back into lawful compliance with existing licensing and registration requirements.

That is why we are seeking comments on a proposal to extend the firearms amnesty for one more year.
china.jpg

CANADA AROUND THE WORLD

 

Chinese Court Sentence Against Huseyincan Celil

 

On Thursday 19 April 2007, Mr. Celil, a Canadian citizen who has been detained in China since extradition from Uzbekistan in June 2006 was sentenced to life imprisonment by a Chinese court.  Our Foreign Affairs Minister, the Honourable Peter MacKay, has registered Canada’s concerns with the Chinese Chargé d’affaires. The Minister also spoke with Mr. Celil's spouse, Kamila Telendibaeva, to assure her that Canada will continue to pursue justice for Mr. Celil.  

 

As Canadians we should be deeply disappointed with this verdict.  Chinese authorities have persistently refused to respond adequately to our reasonable concerns with respect to due process for this Canadian citizen.  They have also failed to allow Canadian officials an opportunity to provide consular assistance to Mr. Celil, in spite of repeated requests.

 

The Government of Canada remains gravely troubled by allegations that Mr. Celil has been mistreated while in Chinese custody and was possibly subjected to torture.

 

As Canadians, we call upon the Government of China to investigate such claims promptly and impartially and to ensure that Mr. Celil’s rights are adequately protected.

 

As the Canadian government of Mr Harper believes that China did not live up to the spirit of the 1999 Canada-China consular agreement in this case, it will be conducting a review of the agreement to determine whether it is, in fact, an effective means of safeguarding Chinese-Canadian dual citizens travelling on Canadian passports.

 

The Canadian government strongly urges Chinese authorities to respect their commitment to provide Canadian officials with information about Mr. Celil, and to ensure that he is accorded due process.  The Canadian Embassy in Beijing is following the situation closely and will continue to monitor developments.

 

© Copyright 2008
Powered By Cachelan